Dr. Mercola Interviews Alasdair Philips: EMF’s Effect on Health: What the Research is Showing and What We can Do To Limit Radiation Exposure From Wireless Devices

Dr. Mercola interviews (see video below) Alasdair Philips of Powerwatch.org.uk.  Philips has been “researching electromagnetic fields effect on health”  for decades and his website is a resource for those who want to read the studies.  In the interview (which is free ranging) Philips shares details about various studies as well as what he thinks the research as a whole is showing. He also shares a wealth of other information about the wireless devices themselves and the radiation they are emitting.    It’s a long interview and here are my [rough draft] notes (close paraphrase and direct quotes) as I listened to it.

Power Lines and Childhood Leukemia: Philips discusses how power lines, when their magnetic fields go above a certain level, double the rate of childhood leukemia.  The level when this occurs, though, is only a “tiny fraction of the standard set for our protection.”  He said there are over twenty studies which show the increased rate.

Standards: He said (10:04) the “standardizing process” which was set via the World Health Organization’s EMF Project was industry funded.  It was dominated for 30 years by one person, Michael Repacholi (with connections to an NGO, ICNIRP).   Those standards are now “set in stone.”  The “thermal effects” (which is the standard the FCC uses) he considers a “red herring.”  None of the concerns about cancer, he says,  come from the “thermal effects.”

He discusses melatonin, what our bodies produce when we sleep, as “radio protective anti cancer” (that is, it helps us fight the damage from the radiation we are exposed to during the day from wireless devices, including “smart” meters, and antennas.  This is why it is important to sleep in a very dark room. [He gives details about what can interfere with melatonin production].
At 21:23 on the tape, he discusses mobile phones. “Since 1998 the evidence has mounted and mounted,” he says. He has “no doubt that it causes brain tumors.”
Cell Phones Versus Cordless:  The newer 3G cell phones can turn themselves down–will expose you less than a cordless phone, which pulse 24/7 even when you’re not using them.  For Cell Phones, “ideally use an air tube.”  The prior 2G phones pulses 217 times a second–so perhaps 3G is slightly better.
Cell Phones and Cancer. He says at about 55:00 minutes in the video that they are seeing increasing “frontal and temporal” brain tumors.  At the same time, there is a decrease [statistically] in brain tumors. He thinks the decrease is because we’ve passed the peak from atomic bomb testing. . .but the brain tumors (in specific areas near where cell phones are used) are “on the rise.”   He talks about a study in August about children and cell phones. In that study there is a “table 5″ which discusses “three, four and five fold increases [in tumors] if they’ve had the phone for 7 or 8 years.” “May not need a lot of exposure to trigger that initial derangement of the cell which goes into tumors.     Most cancers have nothing to do with breaking a covalent bond.  So what.  Most cancer is not due to covalant bond breaking.   We haven’t got a clue as to what causes cancers and what the mechanism is. . . Gene switches. .. which are caused by stress.  . . .”

Wi Fi: He says get rid of the wi fi, (completely unnecessary) that now there is something called D-Lan–where you can plug Ethernet cable into main socket and then in any room in the house you can plug in another device (without laying extra wires). “Comparing Wi-Fi levels with levels you get 100 meters from a cell phone tower, which is roughly the same. . . . If you’re sitting next to a wi-fi lap top with a wi-fi router in the houses. . . it’s equivalent to having a small mobile phone base station in your house.”

Back to Cell Phones (and Effect of RF on Vulnerable Tissues such as testes and Eyes): He cites Sam Milham : Ham radio  operators got a cataract on their eyes–on the inside of their eyes which is inoperable.   He thinks using bluetooth (“something stuck in your ear, low levels of microwave) is crazy.”   He warns (commonly done by teenagers) to not put one’s cell phone under one’s pillow:  You “don’t want to be lying on it where it’s really going to be struggling to get its signal out to a bay station.”  Women shouldn’t tuck it into their bras.

Doctor who treated tumors with radiation:  “5 minute exposure to cell phone. . could turn a 5% active tumor into a 95% active tumor for about an hour.  So if he did that first his radiation therapy was more effective. . .”
See 1:06:00 on tape about ways cells contaminate other cells and can cause cancer (not by breaking bonds).

At 1:01:00 in the tape he talks about how our exposure now to electromagnetic radiation from all this technology is a “billion fold” from what it was [for thousands of years prior).

Posted in Cell Phones, Cordless Phones, FCC Standards, Radiation, Health Impact, Science, How This Happened, History, Impact on Children, Pulsed Radiation, Wi Fi | 1 Comment

Faster than a Speeding Bullet, More Powerful than a Locomotive, Able to Leap Tall Buildings in a Single “Radioactive” Bound: It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane–It’s Wi-Fi 5G!

The website 5GWiFi, set up by Irvine-based Broadcom, offers a “primer” on the new IEEE 802.11 ac or “5G” Wi Fi chip.  Scroll down to the “technical details” to read about the RF spectrum and “beamforming.”  Note: Be prepared when reading industry ads to be transported “kidlike” back to Superman watching days: This chip will allow people to use Wi-Fi “on the move,”  to not be tethered to their desks, to take their devices wherever they please and form “ad-hoc” work groups. It will improve, they say, (using such a fun word to mouth, it could be awarded best “word candy” of the year) “connectivity,” opening up a whole new “freeway”–with lots of driving room (“wide lanes”) for one’s data and an ability with the “beamforming” capacity to avoid “potholes,” and penetrate surfaces heretofore shielded from Wi-Fi radiation such as concrete:

Many factors affect the coverage area of a network—most notably, the way a structure is built. Concrete walls, ceramic bathroom tile, and metal appliances are more difficult for Wi-Fi signals to penetrate, in contrast to wooden walls with gypsum board, which are easier to penetrate. But signals from IEEE 802.11ac networks, with beamforming and other innovations, do a much better job in penetrating all forms of building materials than do the signals from its predecessor networks. In fact, the ability of IEEE 802.11ac signals to transmit through some concrete walls is expected to help homes in India and China, where concrete is used extensively as a construction material.”

One can get so swept away reading industry ads, that it may only occur later, when one is scrubbing the kitchen sink,  the window slider open even though it is a gray day and they are predicting rain, that the ability of these new chips to penetrate concrete, ceramic and metal means that along with all the “exciting” new features the new 5G WiFi chip is “offering,” it will also be disrespecting our boundaries and invading our personal spaces:  the walls of our homes,  the skin which separates our bodies from the air around us; and, as the IARC WHO “Working Group” wrote in its discussion of EMF’s in The Lancet Oncology ,  it will, in fact, “couple” with our bodies “resulting in induced electric and magnetic fields and associated currents inside tissues”; and people who want to shield from this radiation will have a lot more difficulty.

Posted in Radiation, Shielding, Wi Fi | Leave a comment

Barry Trower on Wi Fi Radiation: “We Are Risking the Future Generations of All the Children in the World”

This past week, my attention was on Wi-Fi in schools as I have a third grader whose school has both cabled internet and Wi-Fi routers. (I spoke this past week to both the school board and the PTA.)   When I had asked a school official, a few months ago, why they needed, since the school was already cabled, Wi-Fi, I was told it was so teachers could   teach special lessons using IPADs. The official told me the goal was “to blanket” every corner of the school  in Wi-Fi.

The school district seems to take an aloof but polite approach to any parent who brings up the topic.  The parents can give various feedback but they are “out of the loop” in terms of having a kind of working input.  The district personnel become increasingly quiet and non responsive and do not get back about meetings that initially they proposed.  At the end of this week,  I learned not from a school official but from another parent that the school district has ordered “safety testing.”

What kind of “safety testing” could this be?  Could it possibly be someone who will come in and do readings to confirm that the Wi-Fi “does not exceed FCC limits?”  Is this the school district version of Edison and PG&E?  Yet industry (utility as well as mobile phone companies) are big business, and we’re used to them behaving with a kind of ruthlessness  when it comes to squelching information which could interfere with their market goals. But for a school district? For principals and teachers to behave that way?   For educators?

Barry Trower, retired British military intelligence scientist, a physicist and specialist in microwaves, does not mince words about Wi-Fi or the way school personnel are handling this: “Wi Fi should be wiped out of schools at a stroke today to protect all the children,” he states.  I suspect he would also call into question the so-called “safety testing” my son’s school district has ordered:   “A lot of people make the mistake in believing that children are small adults. And unlike medication—there you have an adult dose and a children’s dose–with microwaves there is the adult dose, but there is no known safe dose of microwave safe radiation anywhere in the world published for a child.”   He says the schools are using “intentional ignorance. . . They will only look at and believe the research they want to. They will not acknowledge most of the real research and most of the risks.  There is such a pressure and hype to get this technology.”

In the videos below (and also the illustration that he drew to make the point as simple as possible),  Trower discusses genetic effects of exposing children and our population to microwave radiation.  He is especially concerned about Wi-Fi because of its impact on young children.

Untitled

Here are two videos of Barry Trower, the first a short one and the second a longer interview.  This quote is taken from the second interview:

Young girls are born with all the . . . . eggs they are going to need to develop into fully grown eggs and children. We know that microwaves affect the ovarian follicles and can affect the ovarian eggs. We know that the microwaves. . . can cause genetic damage. If you think of a young girl at school–she’s sitting here and she has the Wi-Fi sets transmitting straight through the uterus into the ovaries. If the young girl damages the ovarian eggs–and we’re not going to know this for another 15 years–if the ovarian eggs are damaged, these are irreparable. They can never ever be repaired. The mitochondrial DNA in girls is irreparable. So when that girl—if she  has  a daughter, that daughter will carry the genetic damage that has been caused by the microwaves and when she has a daughter that daughter will carry the same disease and her daughter and her daughter. . . . So we are now not saying we are risking this generation–we are risking the future generations of all the children in the world from genetic damage. . . .”

Posted in FCC Standards, Radiation, Genetic Damage, Health Impact, Science, Impact on Children, Wi Fi | Leave a comment

Power-Lines (Chino Hills) and Smart Meters: Kissing Cousins

The fight by residents of Chino Hills, California, to prevent Edison from installing high voltage transmission lines within 40 feet (in some cases) of their homes and the issues raised: the EMF they emit, the solid studies of childhood leukemia, the efforts (unethical) by the utility industry to prove otherwise are like “cousins” to the “smart” meter issue.

Another aspect in common with “smart” meters is the irony because the high voltage transmission lines that they are erecting are to carry “renewables” (in Chino Hills case, for wind)–so the very reason to erect these polluting high voltage towers is to supposedly be “green.” However, it’s what the mayor of Chino Hills, Ed Graham, calls “politically correct  [as opposed to, in fact]  green energy.” 

We have a similar situation with the utilities’ expensive, wasteful and polluting smart meter roll out.   Millions of analog meters built to last for decades tossed in the dump; replaced by soon to be obsolete digital “smart” meters. Federal funds and rate payer hikes to finance it.  Nothing inherently green about it, but rather a behavioral modification program from the 1930′s (they raise your rates; you use less energy). Energizing our airways with completely man-made RF radiation which didn’t exist 100 years ago.  A kind of radiation which, as Jerry L. Phillips, (whose team was the first to find DNA damage from RF exposure) says, comes out of “machines” and has biological effects on human cells.  A kind of radiation which can cause cancer directly by damaging  DNA, and can cause cancer indirectly and other serious effects (such as pre-senile dementia) by weakening the blood brain barrier.  Is this conservation or extinction?

Here is an introduction and then the letter, re-printed in full, from the Mayor of Chino Hills about their situation.  Their city has spent more than 2 million dollars fighting this.

***

Last June the Mayor of Chino Hills sent this Open Letter to Southern California Edison and the CPUC.  It is in regards to Southern California Edison using a long held easement to install high voltage transmission lines close to Chino Hills residents’ homes which will carry energy generated by wind. Wrote Chino Hills Mayor Ed Graham:  “Never did anyone expect that a CPUC review process would allow the construction of poles that climb to nearly 200 feet in a 150-foot easement, much less that they would be approved to carry double-circuit 500 kV power lines – a level of energy unheard of in residential neighborhoods throughout the entire United States.”

Open Letter from the City of Chino Hills to: Continue reading

Posted in general | Leave a comment

CPUC Smart Meter Opt Out Ruling: The Good and The Bad

The CPUC, which seems bloated with industry insiders, voted on February 1, 2012, to approve a proposal which will allow PG&E customers in California  (see note*) who want analog meters to pay a $75 dollar upfront “install” fee (which you will be charged even if your analog is already installed) and an ongoing ten dollar monthly fee –this despite almost two hours of public comments from over 60 speakers who spoke against the fees as a form of extortion. (The analog option does not help those who live above, as was the case for one speaker,  a bank of 42 meters;  or those still made sick by their neighbors’ nearby smart meters.)  As one speaker said “We should be a smart meter free state.”

“Some people may never be satisfied,”  Commissioner Ferron later said.  This may especially be the case when they realize the CPUC  has given their utility company authority to charge them a bundle of new fees to keep what they already had (analogs) in the first place.

President Peevey used his time at the podium to talk about how the White House had sent a “technology emissary,” Aneesh Chopra, to California  just a few days prior;  and to promote the benefits of “smart” meters” to “empower consumers.”

Virtually every speaker in the room (other than the commissioners) spoke against “Smart” meters, and even people who came to talk about other matters put in a word against “smart” meters.   The absence of any pro smart meter speakers seemed to concern Commissioner Simon as he later  used some of his podium time to  urge  “beneficiaries”  of the wireless  technology to speak up, complaining that the argument has been “one-sided.”

Although those of us on the delay list are grateful that we will not have to steel ourselves to either accept a carcinogen on our own property or be threatened with jail or power shut off if we don’t,  there are still many issues with the ruling (particularly for those living near multiple meters) which will leave “some people” not only dissatisfied,  but unable to benefit from it.  As one speaker pointed out,  people with health conditions are often on disability and can’t afford to pay other people’s opt out.  Their neighbors may even be too poor to pay their own.  Even for those with more resources, it could cost thousands of dollars to opt out.

Some of this dissatisfaction that Commissioner Ferron was referring to spilled over after the vote when people were leaving.  Some speakers cried “shame” and broke into a group chant: We Say No Fee. Charge the Utility!   One woman—in grey pants, with a long green scarf knotted over a black sweater and long blonde hair—who earlier had told about her neighbor’s baby who had leukemia and how the mother had been exposed to smart meter radiation during her pregnancy—walked to the front of the room and looked up at the commissioners.

“I’m an advocate for my cancer smart meter baby. She is crying to you.  This is a crime against humanity. This is a crime against humanity.”

“She’s right!” someone yelled.

“Let’s go.”  Peevey said in his brusque voice

“You should be ashamed of yourself. Crime against humanity!”

“Could we have a little security here, please?” Peevey called out as she walked away, joining the crowd massed against the open doorway, slowly shuffling out.

The camera fixed on Peevey sitting at the podium (brown suit, black curtains behind his chair)—as he and the other commissioners waited for the smart meter people to leave.  Another voice, female, could be heard  ”I’m going to have to leave my house. I’ll have to leave America because of you guys. Thank you.  I’ve been sick for two years  cause of you guys. I’ve explained it from every single angle and you guys still don’t get it.”  The words floated like some fly around  Peevey’s white haired pink faced head.

Commissioner Simon said something (which the audio did not pick up); and the three commissioners at the table (Peevey, Simon and Sandoval) burst into laughter.  Somebody later turned off the mike.  Then  when the last of the smart meter speakers had finally made it through the doorway, the mike was turned back on.

“Close the doors!”  Peevey said.

“I’m pleased,” Peevey now said, addressing the audience, “to bring this next item before you today.  .  . “

***

**Note: The ruling is officially only for PG&E customers.   We have been told by the CPUC public advisor that what goes for PG&E will also go for SCE and SDG&E.

Posted in CPUC/Complaints, Health, Personal Stories, Follow the Money, Smart Meters, "Opt Out" Issues, Analog Meter, PG&E | Leave a comment

“People Aren’t Going to Take Getting Microwaved in Their Own Homes” (Interviews Post CPUC’s Smart Meter Opt Out Ruling)

“I think it was very very significant that Obama sent out I believe it was the head of the department of energy Chopra to speak to the CPUC on this.  They’re really worried about what is going and they know that we have a momentum here that people aren’t going to take getting microwaved in their own homes. . .  . We need to go to Obama. We need to go to the FCC.  We need to demand exposure standards which are based on biology not mythology or whatever it is they’re basing them on–because they’re not basing them on the truth.” –Angela Flynn, Green Evolution 

Posted in EHS, CPUC/Complaints, Health, Personal Stories, Smart Meters, "Opt Out" Issues, analog meters, PG&E | Leave a comment

Chair of IARC Working Group: Designation of RF as a class 2B Carcinogen has “Broad Applicability” (which means it includes Smart Meters)

“The designation of group 2b is radio frequency electromagnetic fields–that is unspecified as to source so the group 2b classification would have broad applicability to sources with this type of emissions”--Jonathan Samet, MD, Chairman of the Working Group of 31 Scientists for The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) which, on May 31, 2011, declared radio frequency electromagnetic fields as a possible class 2B carcinogen.

Posted in Health Impact, Science, Smart Meters, Radiation, Class 2b Possible Carcinogen | Leave a comment